Collaborative Conversations is a technique which encourages teachers to provide students time each day to engage with their peers in collaborative conversations using the language of science, history, math, etc. The book suggests teachers set clear expectations regarding conversations and to hold students accountable for their conversations. The writer phrases it this way, "Students use accountable talk to persuade, provide evidence, ask questions of one another, and disagree without being disagreeable." The book also suggests that teachers provide a framework for students. A couple of examples are "The reason I believe _____ is because _______." or "I disagree with ____ because _____."
This would be a good tool to use in Geometry classes when discussing proofs. Students could discuss the steps/reasons and justify their responses.
In Algebra 2, after students have learned various methods for solving quadratic equations, students could discuss which method would be the best way to solve a quadratic equation and why.
Do you already do this in your classroom? If so, give us some tips. If not, give it a try and let us know how it goes...
Well, I am not sure this is quite the same( or maybe a theatrical version) but we do a "what if" rehearsal when blocking or ensemble moments just are not working. Anyone can make a "what if we" or "what if you" suggestion and we try it without discussion or first assessing the idea. We just go for it, give it a try. I have seen it generate some very creative solutions. But, there do have to be guidelines to keep it positive. All "what if" suggestions are directed to me or the group. Students may not single out other students.
ReplyDeleteThis technique would also be a great tool in a government or history class. Students would use their learning to explain why they agree or disagree with the statement. We are always trying to get our students to think deeper and use the details and facts to back up their opinions.
ReplyDelete